« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: libeller  (Read 215 times)

Alan W

  • Administrator
  • Eulexic
  • *****
  • Posts: 4968
  • Melbourne, Australia
    • View Profile
    • Email
libeller
« on: July 30, 2022, 12:16:55 PM »
I'm surprised nobody has queried the fact that libeller is classed as common while libeler is rare. Any thoughts?
Logged
Alan Walker
Creator of Lexigame websites

ridethetalk

  • Eulexic
  • ***
  • Posts: 2389
  • Energy efficiency - saving money and the climate
    • View Profile
    • Ride the Talk
Re: libeller
« Reply #1 on: July 30, 2022, 01:22:02 PM »
I didn't get either...  :P :P :P

I would probably use defame/defamer - I don't know the difference legally but, in general, I am not liable to use libel...  >:D >:D >:D
« Last Edit: July 30, 2022, 01:25:46 PM by ridethetalk »
Logged
The greenest watt ever produced is the one you never use. Playing as jk1956 & John is my name.
When we come out of the Covid-19 crisis, we need to make sure recovery efforts address the Climate Crisis (which can't be solved using social distancing!)

Jacki

  • Cryptoverbalist
  • *
  • Posts: 972
    • View Profile
Re: libeller
« Reply #2 on: July 30, 2022, 02:15:42 PM »
Seeing you have asked I would think neither is common.
Logged
Late blooming azaleas tricked by the warmer weather into flowering

Maudland

  • Cryptoverbalist
  • *
  • Posts: 936
  • London, UK
    • View Profile
Re: libeller
« Reply #3 on: July 31, 2022, 09:54:00 AM »
I suppose they should be the same, like traveller and traveler - although LIBELER looks wronger! (And gets a red underline - libeller doesn’t…) I don’t have a complaint about libeler being rare, anyway! 🤠
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »