O GAGL:
Am I noticing a Down Under bias in what is considered common? "Dingo" is common while "Dogy" is not. Up here in Ohio--even in Ohio, which is not the Wild West--Dogy is more common than Dingo.
Phooey.
E
Yes, E, there
is a Down Under bias, and I'm not proud of it! Previous instances brought to light include, I think,
nong,
drongo and
toey. I have vowed to review the common/rare word boundary, to eliminate some of the more blatant anomalies.
However, I'm not sure if I agree about
dingo cf
dogy/dogie. A Google search on
dingo gets about 4.8 million results, whereas
dogy gets 363,000 and
dogie gets 146,000.