Author Topic: nacreous  (Read 1510 times)

mkenuk

  • Eulexic
  • ***
  • Posts: 2671
  • Life? Don't talk to me about life.
    • View Profile
nacreous
« on: April 02, 2017, 10:35:20 PM »

  a word should be classed as rare if a lot of people don't know it.

.

In that case, Alan, would you agree that nacreous - classed as common in the cavernous game - should be made rare?

It was played by 34 from 349 players (slightly under 10%).

I'm not even sure how it should be pronounced. 'nakerous'? ''nakrious'?
Needless to say, I can't remember ever seeing or hearing it before.

MK   

TRex

  • Eulexic
  • ***
  • Posts: 2041
  • ~50 miles from Chicago, in the Corn (maize) Belt
    • View Profile
Re: nacreous
« Reply #1 on: April 03, 2017, 06:17:41 AM »
I agree.

Alan W

  • Administrator
  • Eulexic
  • *****
  • Posts: 4974
  • Melbourne, Australia
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: nacreous
« Reply #2 on: July 19, 2017, 12:53:30 PM »
Well, I've left this a good long time to allow someone to pipe up that as far as they're concerned nacreous is a normal everyday word, and they'd be sorry to see the puzzle being dumbed down by classing it as a rare word. Not really - I've left it till now because I haven't got around to replying.

It is a word that appears quite rarely in general publications. Perhaps surprisingly, a big percentage of the examples in the News on the Web corpus were from the Daily Mail - from one article in February 2016, Devastatingly beautiful: Rare nacreous clouds seen painting the skies across the UK - but despite their splendour, the formations can cause holes in the ozone layer.

Nacreous will be a rare word from now on.
Alan Walker
Creator of Lexigame websites

birdy

  • Eulexic
  • ***
  • Posts: 3371
  • Brooklyn, NY
    • View Profile
Re: nacreous
« Reply #3 on: July 26, 2017, 12:17:58 PM »
Another one I know, mostly in the context of pearls, though the examples I just looked up had more to do with clouds.  But I would agree that it isn't common.