41
Words / Re: Passata
« Last post by pat on April 17, 2024, 05:37:02 PM »If so, I think it should be accepted as a rare word.
This suggestion was previously made by mkenuk in May 2012. That thread is here. So far, Morbius, you've kept to your statement in the original post: "I promise this is the last you'll hear from me on this subject!" I was sorely tempted to rely on that undertaking, and ignore the issue! However, you're not the only forumite with an interest in the subject, so I fear it will keep cropping up.
The word was first discussed way back in 2007, in this thread, started by anonsi. It was raised again in 2009, by pat, and I discussed it here. In the end, glute was added as a rare word, and glutes continued to be allowed - and in fact was re-classified from rare to common. The word has been mentioned in a few other discussions over the years.
As I see it, the options are:
- leave things as they are
- bar glutes, as a plural
- continue to allow both glute and glutes, but as rare words (i.e. put glutes back to rare)
- bar glutes, as a plural and make glute a common word
The second option, as urged by mkenuk and Morbius among others, is probably the most logical one. But the problem is that all that would be left in our word list is the singular glute, a rare word. Some people have firmly declared that glute/s is definitely a common word. As stated in a previous thread, my researches tend to confirm that glutes is common, but I would not feel too uncomfortable about treating it as a rare word. But that is probably because, as anonsi correctly surmised in the earlier discussion, I have never been a woman. And I strenuously avoid anything to do with exercise.
I'm tending to lean towards the last option. Although the singular word is used much less frequently than the plural, it's not in the same class as a word like doldrum, which is very rarely used. It probably wouldn't seem weird to say that glute is a common word because of its widespread use these days (mainly in the plural).
Any further thoughts?
My offering today is a book from the 18th century and also a telly series.
***** ********'s immortal trilogy, containing **** ****, **** ** **********, and ********** *****, is a heartwarming portrayal of country life at the close of the 19th century. This story of three closely related Oxfordshire communities - a hamlet, the nearby village and a small market town - is based on the author's experiences during childhood and youth. It chronicles May Day celebrations and forgotten children's games, the daily lives of farmworkers and craftsmen, friends and relations - all painted with a gaiety and freshness of observation that make this trilogy an evocative and sensitive memorial to Victorian rural England
Trilogy originally published in 1945
We watched the first episode and put it into the category of "We will only watch it if desperate". If you can tell me it improves, we might give it another chance.
It would be good if more of them would join in the conversation with us or between themselves on a regular basis. However, we get enough positive feedback to warrant us keeping our public conversation going for the time being. [/color].
My rebus is a 1938 film.
I am still enjoying Beyond Paradise
I've probably mentioned it before but have you watched Murder in Provence
Signora Volpe?
Have we got many sensitive souls who tune into our conversations?